Security Affairs
Cyberattack Hits French Blood Banks as Hackers Target Refrigeration Systems Across Europe|CVE-2026-58868: Critical Android Bug Could Let Attackers Run Remote Code|U.S. CISA adds WordPress flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog|Binance Hack: How Fake Job Interviews and AI Abuse Led to a $6.34 Billion Attack|Synology Warns of Ransomware Attacks Targeting NAS Devices Running Outdated DSM Versions|Inside XCPE, the botnet that turned 1.3M set-top boxes into proxy servers|NIS2 Makes Board Members Personally Liable for Access Control Decisions|Apple’s spyware notifications reach the Bundestag: what the BSI says to do now|VOLTA, the infostealer that asks an AI which victims are worth the effort|New wave of fridge cyberattacks hits European supermarkets, this time in Belgium, Luxembourg, Sweden and Estonia|Hackers Send Fake Nuclear Threat Alerts to Ukrainian and Russian Citizens|Chainalysis Investigates Security Incident Involving AI-Driven Attack Techniques|Cyberattack Hits French Blood Banks as Hackers Target Refrigeration Systems Across Europe|CVE-2026-58868: Critical Android Bug Could Let Attackers Run Remote Code|U.S. CISA adds WordPress flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog|Binance Hack: How Fake Job Interviews and AI Abuse Led to a $6.34 Billion Attack|Synology Warns of Ransomware Attacks Targeting NAS Devices Running Outdated DSM Versions|Inside XCPE, the botnet that turned 1.3M set-top boxes into proxy servers|NIS2 Makes Board Members Personally Liable for Access Control Decisions|Apple’s spyware notifications reach the Bundestag: what the BSI says to do now|VOLTA, the infostealer that asks an AI which victims are worth the effort|New wave of fridge cyberattacks hits European supermarkets, this time in Belgium, Luxembourg, Sweden and Estonia|Hackers Send Fake Nuclear Threat Alerts to Ukrainian and Russian Citizens|Chainalysis Investigates Security Incident Involving AI-Driven Attack Techniques|
Advertisement

Ad Placeholder

Full Width × 90

Breaking News

Experts warn of backdoor-like behavior within Gigabyte systems

Researchers discovered a suspected backdoor-like behavior within Gigabyte systems that exposes devices to compromise. Researchers from firmware security firm Eclypsium have discovered a suspected backdoor-like behavior within Gigabyte systems. The experts discovered that the firmware in Gigabyte systems drops and executes a Windows native executable during the system startup process. The executable is utilized for insecure […]

Gigabyte

Researchers discovered a suspected backdoor-like behavior within Gigabyte systems that exposes devices to compromise.

Researchers from firmware security firm Eclypsium have discovered a suspected backdoor-like behavior within Gigabyte systems.

The experts discovered that the firmware in Gigabyte systems drops and executes a Windows native executable during the system startup process. The executable is utilized for insecure downloading and execution of additional payloads. The experts pointed out that this is the same behavior observed for other OEM backdoor-like features like Computrace backdoor (a.k.a. LoJack DoubleAgent) and firmware implants such as Sednit LoJax, MosaicRegressor, Vector-EDK. 

Further analysis revealed that this behavior is present in hundreds of models of Gigabyte PCs.

“This backdoor appears to be implementing intentional functionality and would require a firmware update to completely remove it from affected systems.” reads the analysis from Eclypsium. “While our ongoing investigation has not confirmed exploitation by a specific threat actor, an active widespread backdoor that is difficult to remove poses a supply chain risk for organizations with Gigabyte systems.”

Firmware security firm Eclypsium said it first detected the anomaly in April 2023. Gigabyte has since acknowledged and addressed the issue.

Upon analyzing of the impacted UEFI firmware, the researchers identified a file named

File Name: 8ccbee6f7858ac6b92ce23594c9e2563ebcef59414b5ac13ebebde0c715971b2.bin, which is a Windows Native Binary executable. The executable resides in a UEFI firmware volume.

The firmware writes the executable to disk at the system boot process, this technique is commonly employed by UEFI implants and backdoors.

The executable can be used to carry out malicious activities such as downloading and executing additional payloads.

The Windows executable is a .NET application that downloads and runs an executable payload from one of the following locations, depending on its configuration:

  • http://mb.download.gigabyte.com/FileList/Swhttp/LiveUpdate4
  • https://mb.download.gigabyte.com/FileList/Swhttp/LiveUpdate4
  • https://software-nas/Swhttp/LiveUpdate4

The experts pointed out that the use of HTTP opens the doors to Machine-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks. The researchers also noticed that even when using the HTTPS protocol, the validation of the remote server certificate is not implemented correctly allowing MITM attacks also in that case. 

Compounding the situation, the firmware doesn’t support digital signature verification for the executables.

“The dropped executable and the normally-downloaded Gigabyte tools do have a Gigabyte cryptographic signature that satisfies the code signing requirements of Microsoft Windows, but this does little to offset malicious use, especially if exploited using Living-off-the-Land techniques (like in the recent alert regarding Volt Typhoon attackers).” continues the report. “As a result, any threat actor can use this to persistently infect vulnerable systems either via MITM or compromised infrastructure.”

The backdoor-like behavior likely impacts more than three hundred Gigabyte systems

These issues expose organizations wide a wide range of attack scenarios. 

  • Abuse of an OEM backdoor by threat actors.
  • Compromise of the OEM update infrastructure and supply chain.
  • Persistence using UEFI Rootkits and Implants.
  • MITM attacks on firmware and software update features.
  • Ongoing risk due to unwanted behavior within official firmware. 

Eclypsium recommends the following actions to minimize the risk:

  • Scan and monitor systems and firmware updates.
  • Update systems to the latest validated firmware and software.
  • Inspect and disable the “APP Center Download & Install” feature in UEFI/BIOS Setup on Gigabyte systems and set a BIOS password to deter malicious changes.
  • Block the above URLs.

The researchers are working with Gigabyte to address this issue.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, Gigabyte)