Security Affairs
Two Barracuda ESG Flaws Could Be Combined for Full Root Access; Patches Released|Cyberattack Hits French Blood Banks as Hackers Target Refrigeration Systems Across Europe|CVE-2026-58868: Critical Android Bug Could Let Attackers Run Remote Code|U.S. CISA adds WordPress flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog|Binance Hack: How Fake Job Interviews and AI Abuse Led to a $6.34 Billion Attack|Synology Warns of Ransomware Attacks Targeting NAS Devices Running Outdated DSM Versions|Inside XCPE, the botnet that turned 1.3M set-top boxes into proxy servers|NIS2 Makes Board Members Personally Liable for Access Control Decisions|Apple’s spyware notifications reach the Bundestag: what the BSI says to do now|VOLTA, the infostealer that asks an AI which victims are worth the effort|New wave of fridge cyberattacks hits European supermarkets, this time in Belgium, Luxembourg, Sweden and Estonia|Hackers Send Fake Nuclear Threat Alerts to Ukrainian and Russian Citizens|Two Barracuda ESG Flaws Could Be Combined for Full Root Access; Patches Released|Cyberattack Hits French Blood Banks as Hackers Target Refrigeration Systems Across Europe|CVE-2026-58868: Critical Android Bug Could Let Attackers Run Remote Code|U.S. CISA adds WordPress flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog|Binance Hack: How Fake Job Interviews and AI Abuse Led to a $6.34 Billion Attack|Synology Warns of Ransomware Attacks Targeting NAS Devices Running Outdated DSM Versions|Inside XCPE, the botnet that turned 1.3M set-top boxes into proxy servers|NIS2 Makes Board Members Personally Liable for Access Control Decisions|Apple’s spyware notifications reach the Bundestag: what the BSI says to do now|VOLTA, the infostealer that asks an AI which victims are worth the effort|New wave of fridge cyberattacks hits European supermarkets, this time in Belgium, Luxembourg, Sweden and Estonia|Hackers Send Fake Nuclear Threat Alerts to Ukrainian and Russian Citizens|
Advertisement

Ad Placeholder

Full Width × 90

Breaking News

Critical Fortinet FortiClient EMS flaw exploited for Remote Code Execution

Attackers are exploiting a critical Fortinet FortiClient EMS flaw (CVE-2026-21643) that allows remote code execution via SQL injection. A critical Fortinet FortiClient EMS vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-21643 (CVSS score of 9.1), is now being actively exploited. Defused researchers warn that threat actors are exploiting the vulnerability in Fortinet’s FortiClient EMS platform. “Fortinet Forticlient EMS CVE-2026-21643 […]

fortinet FortiBleed

Attackers are exploiting a critical Fortinet FortiClient EMS flaw (CVE-2026-21643) that allows remote code execution via SQL injection.

A critical Fortinet FortiClient EMS vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-21643 (CVSS score of 9.1), is now being actively exploited.

Defused researchers warn that threat actors are exploiting the vulnerability in Fortinet’s FortiClient EMS platform.

“Fortinet Forticlient EMS CVE-2026-21643 – currently marked as not exploited on CISA and other Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) lists – has seen first exploitation already 4 days ago according to our data Attackers can smuggle SQL statements through the “Site”-header inside an HTTP request According to Shodan, close to 1000 instances of Forticlient EMS are publicly exposed.” Defused wrote on X.

In February, Fortinet issued an urgent advisory to address the critical FortiClientEMS vulnerability. The vulnerability is an improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL Command (‘SQL Injection’) issue in FortiClientEMS. An unauthenticated attacker can trigger the flaw to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests.

“An improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL Command (‘SQL Injection’) vulnerability [CWE-89] in FortiClientEMS may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests.” reads the advisory.

A successful attack could give attackers an initial foothold in the target network, enabling lateral movement or malware deployment.

The vulnerability was internally discovered and reported by Gwendal Guégniaud of Fortinet Product Security team.

Below are the affected versions:

VersionAffectedSolution
FortiClientEMS 8.0Not affectedNot Applicable
FortiClientEMS 7.47.4.4Upgrade to 7.4.5 or above
FortiClientEMS 7.2Not affectedNot Applicable

In February, the vendor did not disclose whether the vulnerability is currently being actively exploited in the wild.

Despite not yet appearing in major exploited lists, real-world attacks have already been observed.

Shadowserver researchers report approximately 2,000 FortiClient EMS instances exposed online, most of them in the U.S. (756) and Europe (683).

In March 2024, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) added a FortiClient EMS SQL Injection Vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2023-48788, to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, Fortinet)