Security Affairs
Cyberattack Hits French Blood Banks as Hackers Target Refrigeration Systems Across Europe|CVE-2026-58868: Critical Android Bug Could Let Attackers Run Remote Code|U.S. CISA adds WordPress flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog|Binance Hack: How Fake Job Interviews and AI Abuse Led to a $6.34 Billion Attack|Synology Warns of Ransomware Attacks Targeting NAS Devices Running Outdated DSM Versions|Inside XCPE, the botnet that turned 1.3M set-top boxes into proxy servers|NIS2 Makes Board Members Personally Liable for Access Control Decisions|Apple’s spyware notifications reach the Bundestag: what the BSI says to do now|VOLTA, the infostealer that asks an AI which victims are worth the effort|New wave of fridge cyberattacks hits European supermarkets, this time in Belgium, Luxembourg, Sweden and Estonia|Hackers Send Fake Nuclear Threat Alerts to Ukrainian and Russian Citizens|Chainalysis Investigates Security Incident Involving AI-Driven Attack Techniques|Cyberattack Hits French Blood Banks as Hackers Target Refrigeration Systems Across Europe|CVE-2026-58868: Critical Android Bug Could Let Attackers Run Remote Code|U.S. CISA adds WordPress flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog|Binance Hack: How Fake Job Interviews and AI Abuse Led to a $6.34 Billion Attack|Synology Warns of Ransomware Attacks Targeting NAS Devices Running Outdated DSM Versions|Inside XCPE, the botnet that turned 1.3M set-top boxes into proxy servers|NIS2 Makes Board Members Personally Liable for Access Control Decisions|Apple’s spyware notifications reach the Bundestag: what the BSI says to do now|VOLTA, the infostealer that asks an AI which victims are worth the effort|New wave of fridge cyberattacks hits European supermarkets, this time in Belgium, Luxembourg, Sweden and Estonia|Hackers Send Fake Nuclear Threat Alerts to Ukrainian and Russian Citizens|Chainalysis Investigates Security Incident Involving AI-Driven Attack Techniques|
Advertisement

Ad Placeholder

Full Width × 90

Breaking News

Expired certificate caused a Pulse Secure VPN global scale outage

Pulse Secure VPN users were not able to login due to the expiration of a code signing certificate used to digitally sign and verify software components. Pulse Secure VPN users were not able to login after a code signing certificate used to digitally sign and verify software components has expired. Multiple users have reported on […]

Pulse Secure VPN

Pulse Secure VPN users were not able to login due to the expiration of a code signing certificate used to digitally sign and verify software components.

Pulse Secure VPN users were not able to login after a code signing certificate used to digitally sign and verify software components has expired.

Multiple users have reported on Pulse Secure VPN community their difficulties to log in their devices.

Pulse Secure VPN

This issue caused several problems to the users, most of them are working from home due to the pandemic and were not able to connect to company resources. Upon attempting to login from their browsers, users have displayed the message “An unexpected error has occurred,”, “Detected an internal error. Please retry. If the issue persists, contact your administrator.”

According to an advisory published by Pulse Secure, multiple functionalities/features fail for End-Users with a Certificate error.

The outage stems from a bug related to the improper verification of the signature for Pulse Secure components. The check of the signature was performed on the certificate’s expiration date rather than the timestamp on a digitally signed file.

Experts noticed that the code-signing certificate used to sign the file has expired on April 12, which means that signature analyzed was considered not valid and caused the massive outage.

“Multiple functionalities/features fail for End-Users with a Certificate error.
This issue started on the 12th of April, 2021 after 12:00 am UTC time as the validity of the code signing certificate expired.” reads the security advisory published by Pulse. “The Code sign verification on the Client-Side components fails because the Certificate expiry time is checked as opposed to the timestamp of the Code signing.”

This issue impacted users of Pulse Connect Secure (PCC) and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS), below the list of affected products:

  1. This impacts PCS/PPS.
  2. This impacts the following releases,
  • 9.1R11.x
  • 9.1R10.x
  • 9.1R9.x
  • 9.1R8.x

       3. This impacts only Windows End-Points.
       4. The following features are impacted:

  • Terminal Services.
  • JSAM
  • HOB
  • CTS
  • VDI
  • Secure Meeting (Pulse Collaboration).
  • Host Checker.
  • Launching of PDC via browser.
  • SAML with External Browser with HC enabled.

The problem does not impact:

  • Users who access Pulse Desktop Client directly (Not Via a Browser).
  • macOS, Linux Users.
  • Release prior to 9.1R8.x

The company suggests users to Use Pulse Desktop Client, instead of launching it through the browser, as workaroud.

The following table reports the release timelines for the fixes,

ProductReleaseETA
PCS9.1R11.x12th April, 2021 (midnight PST)
PCS9.1R8.x13th April, 2021 (End of Day PST)
PCS9.1R9.x13th April, 2021 (End of Day PST)
PCS9.1R10.x14th April, 2021 (End of Day PST)

If you want to receive the weekly Security Affairs Newsletter for free subscribe here.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook

[adrotate banner=”9″][adrotate banner=”12″]

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, VPN)

[adrotate banner=”5″]

[adrotate banner=”13″]