Security Affairs
Google fixes the eighth actively exploited Chrome zero-day of 2026|Iris Ohyama data breach may expose personal information of 7.7 million people|France Blames Iran for the Supermarket Fridge Attacks|QNAP Warns Users as Plex2Shell Flaws Are Used to Hack NAS Devices|CISA and the FBI Warn Of Attacks against Industrial Refrigeration Controllers|Fake GitHub Security Tools Infect Over 2,000 PCs With Malware|The BBC has a plan for a Black Sky event, and it runs on FM radio|Don’t Hand Propaganda a Gift: Reading the Brenner Base Tunnel SE Breach Calmly|SECURITY AFFAIRS AI-CYBERSECURITY NEWSLETTER ROUND 7|SECURITY AFFAIRS MALWARE NEWSLETTER ROUND 122|Security Affairs newsletter Round 603 by Pierluigi Paganini – INTERNATIONAL EDITION|Attackers Exploit Third-Party Provider to Raid French Bank Crédit Mutuel Arkéa|Google fixes the eighth actively exploited Chrome zero-day of 2026|Iris Ohyama data breach may expose personal information of 7.7 million people|France Blames Iran for the Supermarket Fridge Attacks|QNAP Warns Users as Plex2Shell Flaws Are Used to Hack NAS Devices|CISA and the FBI Warn Of Attacks against Industrial Refrigeration Controllers|Fake GitHub Security Tools Infect Over 2,000 PCs With Malware|The BBC has a plan for a Black Sky event, and it runs on FM radio|Don’t Hand Propaganda a Gift: Reading the Brenner Base Tunnel SE Breach Calmly|SECURITY AFFAIRS AI-CYBERSECURITY NEWSLETTER ROUND 7|SECURITY AFFAIRS MALWARE NEWSLETTER ROUND 122|Security Affairs newsletter Round 603 by Pierluigi Paganini – INTERNATIONAL EDITION|Attackers Exploit Third-Party Provider to Raid French Bank Crédit Mutuel Arkéa|
Advertisement

Ad Placeholder

Full Width × 90

Breaking News

Most Tinyproxy Instances are potentially vulnerable to flaw CVE-2023-49606

A critical Remote Code Execution vulnerability in the Tinyproxy service potentially impacted 50,000 Internet-Exposing hosts. Researchers from Cisco Talos reported a use-after-free vulnerability in the HTTP Connection Headers parsing of Tinyproxy 1.11.1 and Tinyproxy 1.10.0. The issue is tracked as CVE-2023-49606 and received a CVSS score of 9.8. The exploitation of the issue can potentially lead […]

Chainalysis

A critical Remote Code Execution vulnerability in the Tinyproxy service potentially impacted 50,000 Internet-Exposing hosts.

Researchers from Cisco Talos reported a use-after-free vulnerability in the HTTP Connection Headers parsing of Tinyproxy 1.11.1 and Tinyproxy 1.10.0. The issue is tracked as CVE-2023-49606 and received a CVSS score of 9.8. The exploitation of the issue can potentially lead to remote code execution.

“A specially crafted HTTP header can trigger reuse of previously freed memory, which leads to memory corruption and could lead to remote code execution. An attacker needs to make an unauthenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.” reads the advisory.

Tinyproxy is an open-source HTTP proxy daemon designed for simplicity and efficiency.

The vulnerability impacts over 90,000 hosts that expose a Tinyproxy service on the internet. Talos researchers published a proof-of-concept exploit code for this vulnerability.

“As of May 3, 2024, Censys observed over 90,000 hosts exposing a Tinyproxy service, ~57% of which are potentially vulnerable to this exploit.” reads the report. 

Most of the exposed hosts are in the United States, followed by South Korea and China.

CountryHost CountPercentage
United States3284636.37%
South Korea1835820.33%
China78088.65%
France52085.77%
Germany36804.07%

Maintainers of the project temporarily addressed the issue with the release of version 1.11.1. tinyproxy 1.11.2 release will definitively fix the issue.

  • “the issue is fixed in master with commit 12a8484

the code may appear naive, but it allows to circumvent the allocation of more memory which could fail again. the straight-forward fix would be to strdup the value retrieved from the key/value store, and then work on that and free it later.

  • the code is only triggered after access list checks and authentication have succeeded.
    so if you use basic auth with a reasonably secure password or allow only specific trusted hosts you won’t have to worry. same if your proxy is only available on a trusted private network, like inside a corporate environment (you gotta trust your employees anyway).

so it seems most tinyproxy users won’t have to worry – because who runs an entirely open proxy on the open internet these days ?”

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, RCE)